Border Patrol Agents Slam Alien Amnesty
U.S. law
enforcement on the frontlines are speaking
their minds about the president’s immigration moves
By Mike Blair
US. Border Patrol agents, secretly the most
outspoken critics of the Bush immigration plans, are warning that security on
our borders presents a clear and increasing danger as even more illegal aliens
flood into the country.
Some officers who spoke to AFP explained that they
feared losing their jobs or being handed departmental reprimands if their
identities were known. Their comments came in the wake of the meeting between
President George W. Bush and his Mexican counterpart, Vicente Fox.
Speaking by telephone, a Border Patrol agent in
Arizona said that this country’s immigration policy, as it pertains to Mexico
and Canada, “is a farce.”
He also expressed his disillusionment with the
lack of White House commitment to the work of the Border Patrol.
“We cannot even get decent vehicles to drive on
our daily patrols. Many are junk and should have been put out of service years
ago. Sometimes I think they would be smarter to give us horses. There is no way
that we can keep the aliens out, while the highest levels of our government are
pussy-footing with Mexico’s leaders and trying to snare the Hispanic vote in
America. We simply do not have the time or the resources,” he said.
Another officer, on duty in southern California,
echoed similar sentiments, making it clear that others shared his views. He
felt there was a panacea for securing our borders:
“The military is the only answer. Only the
military has the manpower that we require to get the job done. I think it was
in American Free Press where I read that the U.S. taxpayers spend more money to
keep secure the borders of foreign countries than they do their own.
“That being the case, our job is hopeless and
keeping America safe is also hopeless. When anyone—and I do mean anyone—can
enter this country without much trouble because our borders are not secured,
then no one in this country, regardless of where in the country they live, is
safe. Ask the families of the people who died on 9-11. They know that,” he
concluded with tinge of bitterness.
The Border Patrol agents are not alone in having
misgivings about the risks facing the United States from new immigration
policies and a lack of serious commitment to providing greater security at U.S.
borders.
Rep. Tom Tancredo, a Colorado Republican who heads
the Immigration Reform Caucus, says that Bush’s plans will just worsen the
terrorism danger that already exists due to the massive flow of illegal aliens
from poverty-stricken Mexico.
“Our borders are as porous as ever to those who
wish to enter the country illegally,” he warns.
Another member of the caucus, Rep. Virgil Goode
(R-Virginia), advocates stationing U.S. troops on the border to support the
Border Patrol.
“I think a valid point would be that the failure
to enact immigration reform substantially makes us more vulnerable to a
terrorist attack,” said Goode.
His comments reflect the fact that, contrary to
public perceptions, there have been problems with the flow of illegal aliens in
his district, tucked away in central Virginia.
OBLIVIOUS
Other concerned observers argue that the White
Houses appears oblivious to the reality that the United States is running up
massive trade deficits, the latest being with Mexico. Official figures show a
trade imbalance of $37 billion in Mexico’s favor–and it is growing.
Some critics point to the origins of the problem
beginning in 1994 when the United States had a trade surplus with Mexico. Then,
along came the impact of the North American Free Trade Agreement and the
Clinton and Bush administrations’ efforts to allow U.S. industry to flow south
of the border, taking with it millions of American jobs.
Those same critics warn that the latest concession
to allow illegal Mexican aliens—at least 8 million of them—to remain in the
United States and work will rob Americans of jobs. Such a policy, they point
out, will set a low ceiling on wages for menial jobs in America, further
aggravating the economic situation.
Dissenting voices in the United States complain
bitterly that all the concessions are one way and benefit Fox, leader of a
country with high levels of poverty and endemic corruption, and with no real
commitment to securing the Mexican side of the border.
In part, the flow of illegal aliens suits the
Mexican economy, with millions pouring into the United States and easing the
burden at home. Additionally, there is a constant flow of dollars back to
Mexico from the millions of illegals in this country.
The explanation from President Bush and those who
support his policies is that “America is part of the global economy.”
His critics respond that his global economy is
costing millions of American jobs.