Countdown to Armageddon?
Are the Israelis willing to start World War III?
Exclusive
to American Free Press
By M.
Raphael Johnson
According to a recent
article by veteran British military analyst Joseph Vialls, Russia has sent the
most advanced and feared missile in the world, owned only by Russia and China,
the P270 Moskit, also known as the “Sunburn,” to Damascus and Tehran.
This can only be understood as a counter to the Israeli threats to use nuclear
weapons against their enemies.
The Sunburn flies at an altitude of 60 feet and is
nearly impossible to defend against. A few fired at Israel could make that
state “history.”
Add to this a new Russian air force installation
near the Kyrgystan/Russia border, coupled with a Chinese base just over their
western border with Kyrgystan, and Armageddon may be on the horizon. All
Russian jets at this new base just outside of Bishkek are equipped with Sunburn
missiles.
Vialls writes:
The gloves are off, and with America and Israel
still unable to steal any oil from Iraq because someone keeps blowing the
pipelines, Russian and Chinese firepower buildup suddenly slammed the door
firmly shut on Caspian oil reserves in the old Soviet republics. For more than
a decade American oil multinationals have been conducting “joint ventures” in
the former Soviet republics bordering the Caspian Sea, with the stated intent
of pumping stolen crude oil out through Turkey, then on to western markets. Now
this route has been blocked permanently, and America is in no position to do
anything about it, because a large part of the U.S. conventional army is
currently bogged down in Iraq, being shot at and killed on a daily basis.
For many who have been watching this region as a
confrontation between the United States and Israel versus Russia largely over
the control of the biggest gas and oil deposits in the world, a new front has
been opened.
As a response to this checkmate, Sharon recently
visited Putin on Nov. 3 to meet with him concerning the nuclear issue in Iran. Quickly,
Sharon permitted Palestinians to return to their jobs and eased their travel
restrictions.
Since the end of the Gorbachev era, the Russian
oligarchs, nearly all Jewish by ethnicity (with the noticeable exception of
Vladimir Potanin), have controlled nearly all key sectors of the Russian
economy. This, of course, includes Russia’s major ace-in-the-hole, oil and gas.
The giant YUKOS conglomerate is presently one of the largest oil companies in
the world, valued at about $40 billion.
YUKOS is the result of a “loans for shares” deal
brokered through the semi-coherent Boris Yeltsin in 1995. Here, the liberal
Russian government swapped loyalty from the oligarchs in exchange for
privatization at prices far below that of the market. This $40 billion giant
was bought for about $300 million, thus looting the entire Russian economy for
the benefit of a handful of Israeli citizens living in Russia.
When YUKOS’s chair, Mikhail Khodorkovsky, was
arrested at the end of last month, the American capitalist establishment went
orbital. Forgetting the 1999 New York Times’s expose on massive money
laundering and fraud from YUKOS, the conservative establishment began to
lionize oligarchy and, specifically, Khodorkovsky.
Recently, The Financial Times weighed in
with a giggly piece from Chrystia Freeland, which referred to the oligarch as a
“democratic activist.” About a paragraph later, the writer said—without
irony—that the oligarch’s model for economics is the robber baron factories of
the early American 20th century. Fox News, on Nov. 3, referred to YUKOS as the
most progressive corporation in Russia.
According to a Nov. 3 Agence France-Presse story,
Khodorkovsky made a deal with Jacob Rothschild this year that control of the
YUKOS giant would pass to Rothschild in the event of Khodorkovsky’s arrest. However,
the Russian government has frozen all YUKOS assets for the time being.
It is significant that YUKOS’s liberal pressure
group, the Open Russia Foundation, is completely controlled by Rothschild now
that its founder is in jail. As their official mission statement reads, “The
motivation for the establishment of the Open Russia Foundation is the wish to
foster enhanced openness, understanding and integration between the people of
Russia and the rest of the world.”
Their board of trustees includes Rothschild and
Henry Kissinger. The Washington, D.C. launch of the organization included Sen.
Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) and Librarian of Congress James Billington, one of the
leading voices against Russian traditionalism in the academic establishment.
Significantly, the Open Russia Foundation recently provided Yale University
with substantial grants to study the Russian economy as well as providing the
Carnegie Foundation with 3 percent of its entire operating budget.
It seems that the drive to control the globe’s
energy is progressing. The American empire’s battles in Serbia, Central Asia,
Iraq and Chechnya are one and the same war. Other than fighting Israel’s
enemies, these adventures are also wars to control Central Asian oil and
natural gas (one of the main pipelines from the Caspian Sea went straight
through Serbia). The control of this wealth by the United States and Israel
necessitates bypassing Russian channels. This means that the Jewish oligarchy
in Russia would become the central actor in world politics.
The Israeli/CIA complex was using Khodorkovsky to
sell off the assets of YUKOS to Exxon/Mobil (as well as a smaller piece to
Texaco), hence bringing Russia’s pipelines into the hands of the western
powers. The Nov. 5 New York Times also indicated that the Bush family’s
Carlyle Group was involved.
It was not long after Putin began threatening the
YUKOS conglomerate that neo-conservative pundits such as William Kristol and
Ariel Cohen began calling Putin a “communist,” “another Stalin” and
“tyrannical.”
The basis of these wild accusations, of course, is
the fact that Putin stands in the way of Zionist domination.
From this, the roles of several other variables
and players develop clearly. The State Department/Harvard University alliance
was meant to “deregulate,” or “privatize” much of the Russian economy precisely
to keep the Russian state out of the equation. Therefore, pro-Israel oligarchs
(that is, Israeli citizens living in Russia) then benefited, placing most of
the economy in their hands, and, by extension, Israel’s.
Russia’s response has been to clamp down on
further foreign penetration into defense and other sensitive industries, and
specifically, to target those believed to be working for both the CIA and
Mossad and attempting to control Central Asian oil.
It needs to be reiterated that where the CIA goes,
Mossad goes as well. Israeli and American interests have come together in the
dominance of the Central Asian region and therefore, so have liberal ideology,
the Beltway set, neo-conservatism, Ivy League eggheads, Christian Zionism, the
Rothschilds and the American media. Afghanistan through the Caspian Sea through
to Georgia, Azerbaijan and into the Balkans (not to mention pipelines leading
to oil-hungry China), have become one single theater of war over trillions of
dollars in oil and gas wealth, incorporating every single power center in
global politics. The battle against the New World Order is being decided in
Moscow.
Therefore, all anti-Russian alliances in the
region, from Islamic fundamentalism to Slavic separatism to the George Soros
“Open Society” Foundation, are in the interests of the CIA/Exxon/Ivy League/NWO
complex.
In Azerbaijan, for example, American elites have
pushed for a “democratic” state, that is, a state not under the control of
pro-Moscow Heydar Aliev, thus leaving the country open to U.S. oil investment.
Aliev, of course, is promoting Russian interests in the region, and thus, has
become a “tyrant” in the Beltway mind.
The American response to this situation within
this region is to create the GUAAM pact, including, Georgia, Ukraine, Armenia,
Azerbaijan and Moldova.
Cohen gives us a clue as to why this entity was
brokered under NATO auspices: “The Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan Pipeline will export up
to 1 million barrels per year of high quality Caspian crude oil by 2005.” In
other words, billions of dollars of oil are slated to be pumped through this
region very soon, and the economic/military alliance of GUAAM is the means to
ensure American control over it. This connects the Serbian, Afghan and Iraqi
wars.
Russia’s response to Israel’s terror threats
against most of the Islamic world is fully understood as both a political and
economic question. Further, increasing cooperation between Russia and India, as
well as China, are clear markers that Putin, one of the few actually competent
leaders in world politics, is building an anti-imperialist and anti-NATO
alliance with the aim of countering American/Zionist moves for the world’s oil
and gas wealth.
The interests, however, go even further than
Zionist control over American foreign policy decision-making. Vialls writes on
another topic: that the existence of the American/Zionist empire is based on
the victory of American forces over the Russian and Islamic. Of course, both in
Bosnia and Chechnya, the Mossad/CIA operatives have not hesitated to assist
fundamentalists in fighting Slavic nationalism, largely because Slavicism is a
greater threat with Putin firmly in the saddle. Islam, divided and leaderless,
with a history of centuries of defeat and colonialism behind it, is only a
potential force in world politics.