Secret Group Manipulates Vote Machines
The widespread use of electronic
voting machines has severely undermined the integrity of elections in the
United States. Behind the companies that make the voting machines is a small
and secretive group of men, including a well-known U.S. senator.
Exclusive
to American Free Press
By
Christopher Bollyn
The mid-term elections have been described as
“revolutionary” due to the unusual success of Republican candidates while a
president from the same party occupied the White House.
However, the upset election results that heralded
the Republican revolution have been accompanied by a credibility gap because of
the historic devolution in how Americans cast their votes.
As a result of the 2000 election fiasco in
Florida, expensive electronic voting machines have replaced paper ballot voting
systems in a growing number of jurisdictions across the United States.
However, the electronic touch-screen voting and
ballot-counting machines lack the transparency and credibility of hand-counted
paper ballots.
Furthermore, troubling revelations about the
people who are invested in the companies that make these voting machines raise
a host of serious questions about the condition of the democratic franchise in
the United States.
The companies that design, build, and operate most
of the voting machines currently being used are privately held and secretive.
Before the 2000 elections, when this reporter tried to learn who owned
Omaha-based Electronic Systems and Software (ES&S), the largest voting machine
company in the United States, the information was simply not available.
ES&S, whose motto is “Better elections every
day,” claims to have counted 100 million ballots in the 2000 election and 56
percent of the vote in the last four presidential elections. However, company
officials have repeatedly refused to discuss the security of their voting
machines or divulge who owns and directs the company.
Two independent writers, Bev Harris of Talion.com
and journalist Lynn Landes of EcoTalk.org, have investigated the voting machine
companies operating in the United States and have discovered a number of
political connections to the Republican Party and a well-known senator from
Nebraska.
THE OMAHA CONNECTION
According to Nebraska’s Elections Office, ES&S
is the only voting machine company certified to count votes in the state. A
small percentage of the vote in Nebraska is still hand-counted.
ES&S was formed in 1997 by a merger of
Omaha-based American Information Systems (AIS) and Dallas-based Business
Records Corp. (BRC). BRC was partially owned by Cronus Industries, a company
with connections to the Hunt brothers from Texas, as well as other individuals
and entities, including Rothschild, Inc.
In 1997, American Information Systems was an
unincorporated, wholly-owned subsidiary of the Omaha World-Herald Company
according to a Department of Justice press release about the merger of AIS with
BRC. American Information Systems’ 1996 sales in all of its product lines were
about $14.3 million.
Nebraska-born Charles T. “Chuck” Hagel moved to
Omaha in 1992 to become chairman of AIS and the McCarthy Group, a private
investment bank, Harris told AFP.
AIS was the voting machine company that counted
the votes by which Hagel was elected to the Senate in 1996. Hagel had only resigned
as CEO of AIS in 1995.
Josh Denney, spokesman for Sen. Hagel’s Washington
office, told AFP that Hagel had been chairman of the board at AIS “for about a
year.” Denney said that Hagel had resigned from the AIS board on March 15,
1995, but had continued to serve as president of McCarthy and Co., until 1996.
Today, Hagel has investments in the renamed Mc
Carthy Group worth between $1 million and $5 million, according to documents
published by Harris on her web site.
Because the McCarthy Group reportedly owns some 35
percent of ES&S, Harris has raised the matter of Hagel’s investment in a
company that counts the votes in Nebraska. Omaha World-Herald reportedly owns
about 45 percent of ES&S.
Lawyers representing ES&S have recently asked
Harris to remove the documents and information from her web site. Harris,
however, has not removed the material, saying that voters need to know who owns
the companies that make voting machines to avoid any possible
conflict-of-interest issues.
Two brothers, Bob and Todd Urosevich, founded AIS
in the 1980s. Today Bob is president of Diebold Election Systems, while Todd is
a vice president at ES&S.
Diebold Election Systems, Inc., a wholly owned
operating subsidiary of Diebold, Inc., recently won a $54 million contract to
overhaul Georgia’s election system technology.
Georgia became the first state in the country to
implement a uniform statewide computerized touch-screen voting system.
The Diebold system was sold to voters in Georgia
as a “state-of-the-art system” that is “more accurate, convenient and
accessible to voters.”
The electronic touch-screen system does not
provide a verifiable paper trail, which degrades the credibility of the
results.