Citizen Grand Jury Indicts Feds Over
Sept. 11 Attacks
Patriots, Researchers Meet in LA to Plan Strategy Against Elite
LOS ANGELES, California—A citizens grand jury has
voted to indict high officials in the U.S. government for complicity in the
events of 9-11 after considering evidence presented by five researchers. The
6-hour event, “Solving the 9-11 Crime —A Citizens Grand Jury,” was organized by
Lynn Pentz of 911truthla.us and held at the Bob Hope Patriotic Hall in Los
Angeles during the evening of Saturday, Oct. 23.
After discussion of the legal and historical basis
for the grand jury, it was decided to enlarge the original grand jury to 23 in
order to comply with California law.
The grand jury heard five researchers present
evidence. They were Webster Tarpley, Barbara Honegger, Don Paul, Jim Hoffman
and this writer.
Some of the evidence that I presented to the
citizens grand jury had never been seen before.
Nay sayers notwithstanding, after hearing the
evidence the jury voted to indict President Bush and other high officials of a
number of charges of complicity in the 9-11 attacks and other offenses related
to actions taken by the administration in their “war on terror.”
The 911truthla.us organization has not yet issued
a press release regarding the votes taken by the citizens grand jury.
Having been asked to discuss the evidence from the
Pentagon, I worked with Eric Hufschmid, author of Painful Questions, to
create a five-minute video presentation with photographs from the Pentagon and
World Trade Center.
MYSTERIES AT THE PENTAGON
Photos were shown from the Pentagon of the
extensive decontamination procedures that were carried out on workers at the
site. The full body suits, respirators, and scrub downs seen at the Pentagon
indicate that the Department of Defense, which supervised the work at the
Pentagon, was aware of the danger of an unusual contaminant at the site, such
as depleted uranium.
I also presented official FEMA photographs from
the Pentagon showing the unexplained presence of pieces of a small jet engine,
roughly three feet in diameter. These photographs were first published in American
Free Press last year. No one has ever claimed that they are part of a
Boeing 757, the kind of aircraft that supposedly hit the Pentagon.
While some readers claimed that the small turbine
wheel seen in the photo could have come from the auxiliary power unit (APU) in
a 757, an engineer with the Arizona-based manufacturer of the APU, told AFP
that the piece was “no part of an APU.”
The fact that the turbine was found next to
insulation and parts of the housing that match its diameter indicates that it
came from a small jet engine of similar size.
This proves that a jet engine with an opening
diameter of between 3 and 4 feet was found at the Pentagon crash site. The
opening diameter of a 757’s jet engine is about 9 feet.
When AFP first published photos of these
unexplained pieces, more than one year ago, the question was raised whether
they could be from an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), such as the Global Hawk:
For those who say a smaller plane or unmanned
drone, such as a Global Hawk, was involved in the Pentagon attack, identifying
the piece in the photo could prove what kind of aircraft hit the building.
The Global Hawk is a single-engine drone that uses
a Rolls Royce Allison engine, hand-built in Indianapolis, Ind. The AE3007H
engine has a diameter of 43.5 inches.
Because the Global Hawk is a surveillance drone,
the engine is contained in a heavily insulated housing, which makes it
extremely quiet. This corresponds with eyewitness reports. American Free
Press asked eyewitness Steve Riskus, who said he was within 100 feet of the
aircraft, what he heard. He said he did not “recall hearing anything.” If a 757
or jet fighter flew at high speed 100 feet from an eyewitness, the sound would
The fact that no evidence of a Boeing 757 at the
Pentagon crash site has been aired publicly, and the discovery of parts from a
much smaller engine, suggest that what struck the Pentagon may not have been a
DU MISSILES AT THE WTC?
With no evidence of a Boeing 757 hitting the
Pentagon available to the public, some 9-11 researchers claim that a DU tipped
missile, probably carried by a weaponized UAV, like the Global Hawk, struck the
Because DU is extremely dense, a wide variety of
missiles in the U.S. arsenal are tipped with DU rods to penetrate the armored
steel of military vehicles and buildings. Uranium is a “spontaneous pyrophoric
material,” meaning it bursts into flames when it reaches its target and
generates such intense heat that it explodes. This is the bright flash that is
caused when a DU missile hits its target.
A white flash some people claim can be seen in
videos of the two planes striking the twin towers in New York is the kind of
event that occurs when a missile with a DU penetrator strikes.
Working with Hufschmid, AFP has found several
photos that show a mysterious burning object passing through the initial
explosion in the South Tower. This object, which displays all the
characteristics of a burning DU penetrator, can be seen on page 39 of Painful
The photo of the fireball that followed the crash
of the plane into the South Tower shows two objects out ahead of the inferno.
One appears as a black dot leaving a trail of white smoke, the second appears
to be a dark rod burning with a white flame followed by a trail of black smoke.
The second object displays the characteristics of
a burning DU penetrator. AFP sent enlarged photos of the object to Marion Fulk,
a retired chemical physicist from the Lawrence Livermore National Lab, and
asked him if this object could be DU.
“Yes, it is possible,” Fulk said. Asked about the
dark smoke trailing behind the nearly pure white flame, Fulk said, “It could be
“Let’s assume it is uranium,” Fulk added. “It’s
burning near the surface, and it’s pretty hot.” The object is small but with
great mass and has huge momentum behind it, Fulk said. “It’s way out ahead of
the explosion, and nothing stopped it.”
If the object was a DU penetrator, that would
explain its intense heat, radiation expert Leuren Moret told AFP. The DU would
have already been burning before it hit the tower. As it passed through the
building some of the penetrator’s kinetic energy would have been converted to
The difference between the orange colors of the
flames coming from the explosion in the tower and the white flame of the small
dense object are indicative of “a huge temperature difference,” Moret said.
The gap between the burning object and its dark
smoke trail is because the vapor coming off of the burning object is very hot
and has to cool in order to condense and form the visible dark colored uranium
oxides, Moret said.