So You Love Freedom?
Then You're a 'Hater,' Says Morris Dees
By Mark Anderson
Did you know that informing Americans about the often
bitter truth about their nation and the world constitutes “hate”? Neither did
we.
But the Alabama-based Southern Poverty Law Center sees
itself fit to list 512 American patriot groups in a special issue of its
quarterly Intelligence Report and characterize them as “hate” groups—even
while admitting, “[The] listing here does not imply that the groups themselves
advocate or engage in violence or other criminal activities, or are racist,” as
the report states.
If these groups are not criminally inclined, then what’s
the problem? The problem from the SPLC’s viewpoint is that many of these
groups, whatever their imperfections, communicate pertinent information to a population
that is increasingly indifferent to, or distrustful of, big media, misplaced or
abused government authority and the rogue corporate structure.
Of course, not every group that made “the list” is always
accurate in its views, nor does freedom of speech mean you must be accurate,
nor does it exclude those who may say stupid things. It’s not illegal to be
eccentric, nor is it against the law to be angry or upset at what’s going on.
Most people are. Deal with it.
Corporate structure has colluded with government to impoverish
the average person and bail out corporate titans to the tune of billions.
Everybody knows this, except, it seems, the SPLC, which wants to tell Americans
and law enforcement officials to distrust these citizen groups while those in
the corporate world rob our nation and close down our industry.
If calling attention to corporate-government actions that
threaten the future of every man, woman and child is “hate,” then some groups
listed by the SPLC stand “guilty as charged.”
But observe that usually those who shout “hate” the loudest
are themselves the “haters,” for lack of a better word. It’s the world’s oldest
trick: Accuse others of what you are guilty of, as a ploy to smear your
perceived opponents. The SPLC seems adept at this. Good people in conservative
groups are lumped in with obscure elements and lesser-known groups who would
disagree with each other on many issues. But the SPLC makes it seem like they
agree on most things, to broaden the smear.
Yet,
it’s not as if the SPLC is particularly important or
credible. This whole thing has become a tiresome perennial exercise for
the
leftist SPLC, which sees anyone to the political
“right” of its positions as
“extremist”—another
abused buzzword used to confuse the population. It’s all a
matter of perspective.
If you are in a group as ultra-left wing as the SPLC, almost everyone
else is
automatically to the right of you. Then it becomes a question only of
who to
put on “the list.”
Meanwhile, the SPLC speaks of illegal immigrants as if
breaking U.S.
immigration laws is unimportant. In other words, it’s OK to enter the nation
illegally, but it’s not OK to protest it. Overall, the SPLC’s work borders on
slander and libel.
The biggest problem, however, is that the SPLC has the ear
of the Department of Homeland Security, among other government agencies that
troll for signs of “domestic terrorism” and may equate these American “extremist”
groups with potential terrorism without justification.
Most Americans are a mixture of “right” and “left” views,
if such labels must be used, and most people actually have much more in common
than is usually assumed. For example, except for a minority of neoconservatives
running our foreign policy (a breed of alleged conservatives who lust for
empire and conquest), a sizable cross section of both liberals and traditional,
constitutional conservatives want to stop fighting perpetual wars.
AFP reminds Americans that there are about 800 U.S. military
bases in at least 120 nations and that our interventionist foreign policy is
bankrupting our nation, maiming and killing our own soldiers who are not given winnable
missions, and bringing untold agony and death on innocent foreign people. Is it
hateful to report that? And excuse us
for noting that Israel does
not need nor deserve exclusive U.S.
protection and foreign aid. The Israeli
army’s slaughter of largely defenseless Palestinians in late 2008 showed the
whole world what that rogue nation is all about.
Thus, hardly more need be said, except to say that just as Germany and other European nations can and should
defend themselves without American taxpayers holding their hands, the same goes
for Israel,
which is perfectly capable, with some 200-400 nuclear weapons, of defending
itself. This is not “anti-Semitism.”
SPLC’s Intelligence Report includes this general description:
“Of these groups, 127 were militias . . . and the remainder includes ‘common-law’
courts, publishers, ministries and citizen groups. Generally, patriot groups
define themselves as opposed to the ‘New World Order,’ engage in groundless
conspiracy theorizing, or advocate or adhere to extreme anti-government doctrines.”
The actual listing consists of John Birch Society, Oath
Keepers, Constitution Party, American Independent Party and various other
patriot-citizen groups and chapters in all 50 states. None gives any indication
of being dangerous. There also is a Texas-based group to end the Federal
Reserve’s private central banking racket, which is tough to define as “hate.”
And Gary Franchi’s principled Restore the Republic in Illinois
is listed, when this writer can personally attest to Franchi’s honesty and
passion to report the truth and make America a better place.
Other, more obscure, groups are listed, too, whose status
and intentions are unknown. Yet, they all have a right to their opinions and to
engage in the political reform process.
Unless engaged in actual, provable crime, any person or
group can say anything they want in the United States. May it always remain
that way, regardless of attempts by some to reclassify free speech as hate speech
and label concerned Americans as “enemies of the state.”
Mark Anderson is
a longtime newsman now working as the deputy editor for AMERICAN FREE
PRESS. Together he and his wife Angie provide many photographs of the
events they cover for AFP. Mark welcomes your comments and inputs as
well as story leads. Email him at at [email protected].Subscribe to American Free Press. Online subscriptions: One year of weekly editions—$15 plus you get a BONUS ELECTRONIC BOOK - HIGH PRIESTS OF WAR - By Michael Piper.
Print subscriptions: 52 issues crammed into 47 weeks of the year plus six free issues of Whole Body Health: $59 Order on this website or call toll free 1-888-699-NEWS .
Sign up for our free e-newsletter here - get a free gift just for signing up!
(Issue # 12, March 22, 2010)
|
